Search for: "Bird v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,284
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
The dissenters stated that they would treat as a proverbial duck any “bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am
Nahid Nassiri v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 5:13 am
The court properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) because he failed to state a cause of action (Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87 [1994]). [read post]
21 Jul 2024, 8:40 am
Bird, but this issue is older, such as the old Blockowicz case (which was a federal case, while this is a state court case). [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The Supreme Court’s big Second Amendment case this term was United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:14 pm
In the hypo, Waldo AI uses bird techniques to influence purchasing decisions. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am
–MacRae v. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm
Let me begin by stating that my views are my own as a Commissioner and not necessarily those of the U.S. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 4:40 am
IrelandTallon v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:44 am
Against this background comes Harrington v. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:02 pm
Cohn, a brilliant, corrupt attorney, first made his name as a prosecutor in the infamous Cold War espionage case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
In Regina v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:18 pm
Rybar (3th Cir. 1996), he wrote: Was United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
I had completed a first draft in the state court ruling. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 10:53 am
The case known as Garland v. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:59 pm
The state cited Schlegel v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am
Three years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 3:47 am
The case of R v ML, 2021 NBCA 27 also stated that the actus reus is made out where a “reasonable person aware of the circumstances would perceive the words as a threat of death or bodily harm”. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:29 am
The burden is therefore placed on the courts to triage these issues for the time being with the definitive outcome of Getty Images v Stability AI being eagerly awaited.Turning to training, a different perspective was offered from the current state of law within the European Union. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
