Search for: "Bird v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 1,253
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Everybody knows that the Chevron doctrine is about to join the dodo bird in its present roosting grounds. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 8:56 am by Chiara Gallo
 EventsEleonora Rosati invited the IPKat readers to join her on the 1st December at Bird&Bird in Brussels for the event entitled “Technological governance at the crossroads: the present and future of EU copyright law”. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:30 am by Bettina Hindin, Esq.
  i Sun Tzu: The Art of War Divorce laws of all states provide that both spouses have the right to “discover” (obtain) virtually any financial document or piece of information about the other spouse and the marriage going back to the day the parties married, However, a bird in the hand is worth two in the bush — it is better to hold onto these documents, have them in your possession than to risk the time and effort in trying to get them back. iii See a Trust… [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
” The complaint alleges Sun made threats against officials with the city, interfered with a lawful court order, violated state custodial interference laws, and engaged in disorderly conduct. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
USA (Bristol Bay Pebble Mine; Clean Water Act; state sovereignty) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/2/2023: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 2:30 pm by Dennis Crouch
As the Sixth Circuit has stated, “[u]nlike information merely exchanged between the parties, ‘[t]he public has a strong interest in obtaining the information contained in the court record.'” See Shane Grp., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Lummi Nation (Fishing Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
ACOE (2001)- Overruled ACOE jurisdiction of isolated wetlands based upon the migratory bird rule. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
ACOE (2001)- Overruled ACOE jurisdiction of isolated wetlands based upon the migratory bird rule. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Also, one can search for patents and what the state of affairs is concerning opt outs, oppositions and UPC cases. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletin One Petition for certiorari was filed on 7/3/23: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]