Search for: "Bird v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 1,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2017, 7:58 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Association des Éleveurs de Canards et d’Oies du Québec, et al., v. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 6:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The complaint otherwise failed to state a cause of action for breach of contract or violation of Judiciary Law § 487(1) (see generally Second Source Funding, LLC v Yellowstone Capital, LLC, 144 AD3d 445, 445-446 [1st Dept 2016]; Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird, LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 669 [1st Dept 2017]; Facebook, Inc. v DLA Piper LLP [US], 134 AD3d 610, 615 [1st Dept 2015], lv denied 28 NY3d 903 [2016]; CPLR 3211[a][7]). [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 12:00 pm by ernst
Strong v Bird (1874): Reassessing the RuleElizabeth Drummond14. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
5 May 2017, 11:37 am by Patricia Salkin
Wooster v Queen City Landing, LLC 2017 WL 1822611 (NYAD 4 Dept. 5/5/017)Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Environmental Review [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 2:56 pm by WIMS
The area contains wetlands that provide habitat for many different species of birds, butterflies, and other wildlife. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
USA (Bristol Bay Pebble Mine; Clean Water Act; state sovereignty) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/2/2023: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm by Unknown
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
Here is some of the latest:New Year mews from the Eastern District of Texas in HTC v Ericsson: Long-time Kat friend, Richard Vary (Bird & Bird) reports on FRAND news from Texas:"In the phone wars, the smallest saleable patent practising unit (SSPPU) argument is a particularly controversial one. [read post]