Search for: "Bird v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 1,265
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2020, 6:05 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 666 [1st Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted].) [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:52 pm by R. Clark Morrison and Scott Birkey
  In County of Maui v Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court held today that point source discharges to groundwater may be regulated where the pollutant ends up in navigable surface waters. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
Its title is the Humane Society of the United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:15 am by Eleonora Rosati
On 28 February last, the third fashion law event organized by Fashion Law London took place in Central London.Megan Curzon (Bird & Bird) and Clara Chasles (Freshfields) were in attendance and now report on what happened that day.Here's what Megan and Clara write:Fashion Law London: The Spring/Summer Collection - Event reportOn 28 February 2020, Rosie Burbidge, Giulia Gasparin, and Eleonora Rosati hosted their third Fashion Law London event, entitled "The… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am by Sophie Corke
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Angry Birds Sues Chicken Restaurant Over Trademark Dispute Rovio Entertainment Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:00 am by Alex Nealon
Angry Birds Sues Chicken Restaurant Over Trademark Dispute Rovio Entertainment Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Bird’s eye view of the courtroom during argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 11:30 pm
It was the application of their carefully stated principles to his case that I thought wrong.Did the House of Lords do any more than cast a peremptory bird’s eye view over the sum awarded by the lower court? [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Plaintiff’s assertion that, had Arenas been better prepared, the jury would have returned a favorable verdict is pure speculation (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 443 [2007]; Bookwood v Alston & Bird, LLC, 146 AD3d 662 [1st Dept 2017]. [read post]