Search for: "Bird v. State"
Results 221 - 240
of 1,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2020, 12:37 am
Of the three key decisions that were scheduled for today, the least important one (a Nokia v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:48 pm
HB Family Limited Partnership v Teton County Board of County Commissioners, 2020 WL 4333464 (WY 7/28/2020) [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:32 pm
(Supreme Court of Ohio in LRC Realty, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 12:54 pm
The case is entitled Podolak et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 7:15 am
Williams, Hassell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 1:38 pm
Howard County, Maryland has become the first jurisdiction in the state and one of few places in the country to pass a mandatory “bird-friendly design” law for new construction of privately owned buildings. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:03 pm
In Oncale v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:05 am
” (Brookwood Cos., Inc. v Alston & Bird LLP, 146 AD3d 662, 666 [1st Dept 2017] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted].) [read post]
17 May 2020, 10:13 am
(Spoiler alert: not a happy ending, this time).United States v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 10:20 am
State v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 8:53 am
On April 23, the Supreme Court of the United States issued an opinion in County of Maui, Hawaii v. [read post]
23 Apr 2020, 2:52 pm
In County of Maui v Hawaii Wildlife Fund, the Supreme Court held today that point source discharges to groundwater may be regulated where the pollutant ends up in navigable surface waters. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 9:15 am
On 28 February last, the third fashion law event organized by Fashion Law London took place in Central London.Megan Curzon (Bird & Bird) and Clara Chasles (Freshfields) were in attendance and now report on what happened that day.Here's what Megan and Clara write:Fashion Law London: The Spring/Summer Collection - Event reportOn 28 February 2020, Rosie Burbidge, Giulia Gasparin, and Eleonora Rosati hosted their third Fashion Law London event, entitled "The… [read post]
12 Mar 2020, 1:48 am
In line with Lord Justice Jacob’s point in Actavis v Merck, the Court of Appeal stated that – in certain circumstances – there is nothing inventive about routinely-taken steps even if the actual outcome had not been predicted. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm
Bird expanded Section 230 immunity. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
Angry Birds Sues Chicken Restaurant Over Trademark Dispute Rovio Entertainment Ltd. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 7:00 am
Angry Birds Sues Chicken Restaurant Over Trademark Dispute Rovio Entertainment Ltd. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:32 pm
Bird’s eye view of the courtroom during argument in June Medical Services v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 10:29 am
Lugones v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 4:51 am
Plaintiff’s assertion that, had Arenas been better prepared, the jury would have returned a favorable verdict is pure speculation (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 443 [2007]; Bookwood v Alston & Bird, LLC, 146 AD3d 662 [1st Dept 2017]. [read post]
