Search for: "Bird v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 1,270
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
17 Jul 2019, 1:28 pm by Florian Mueller
But none of that makes Aspen an exclusive and extremely narrow path to the conclusion Judge Koh reached in FTC v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:58 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently, Gregory Shill of the University of Iowa College of Law describes in The Atlantic how the law effectively compels the use of the automobile, repeating the 1977 SCOTUS reference in Wooley v. [read post]
18 Jun 2019, 8:09 am by sydniemery
Beyer’s work on Lady Bird Deeds: A Primer for the Texas Practitioner is cited in the following article: Denise Cheney, Lady Bird Deeds- Revocable Life Estate Deed, 2019 Advanced Real Est. [read post]
9 May 2019, 9:48 am by Eugene Volokh
Misleh stated that he sought relief consistent with the San Francisco Superior Court's default judgment filed on January 14, 2014 in Hassell v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 8:32 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  If you’re categorizing “birds,” hollow bones are perfectly predictive but not observable, so that’s not how ordinary people implement the category “birds. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:37 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 3:51 pm by Unknown
Uncounseled tribal court convictions as predicate offenses under United States v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 11:10 am
” This “opens up rather opportunistic and destructive battles on the validity of priority claims,” also referring to the Accord v RCT judgment of Mr Justice Birss. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
”Over to guest Kat, Amy Crouch (Simmons & Simmons) who reports on the session:"The SPC panel was moderated by Oliver Jan Jüngst (Bird & Bird LLP, Düsseldorf) and first to take the stage was Marleen van den Horst (BarentsKrans, The Hague) who presented on SPC Reform in the EU. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 3:31 pm by Nathan Sheard
Furthermore, LADOT’s failure to limit law enforcement access to raw trip data through anything less than a warrant signed by a judge is in seeming opposition to the Supreme Court’s holding in Carpenter v. [read post]