Search for: "Bird v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 1,284
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2023, 9:43 am
Take, for example, a hypothetical statute that says that it's illegal "to shoot a flying bird" within 500 feet of a state-owned drone. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 10:33 am by NARF
Supreme Court Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/sct/2022-2023update.html One Petition for certiorari was filed on 7/3/23: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Whitney Gravelle
” The spill killed fish, birds, turtles, and other animals, and devastated thousands of acres of rivers and forest. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 11:41 pm by Aaron Moss
A Matter of Perspective As another example, consider Steinberg v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Murphy v Certain2023 NY Slip Op 02978Decided on June 06, 2023Appellate Division, First Department “The court properly dismissed the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 5:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In summer 2020, while walking her dog in Central Park, a white woman saw a black man who was bird-watching. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:17 am by Eugene Volokh
. [* * *] In 2016, Google received a copy of a Miami-Dade County default judgment in MergeworthRX, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2023, 9:33 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
It is important to establish and enforce a strong, state-of-the-art anti-harassment policy. [read post]
8 May 2023, 3:50 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Further, except where there is deceit directed against a court, Judiciary Law § 487 “applies only to wrongful conduct by an attorney in an action that is actually pending” (Mahler v Campagna, 60 AD3d 1009, 1012-1013; see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178; Meimeteas v Carter Ledyard & Milburn LLP, 105 AD3d 643, 643). [read post]
1 May 2023, 4:36 am by Peter J. Sluka
  Many other states, including California, Nebraska, Illinois, and Florida, have similar statutes. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:11 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
How do you measure the risk of freedom of expression v. copyright takedowns? [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 1:00 am by David Pocklington
Outlining his approach, Wood Ch. observed: “[15] …the problem complained of has denied them the opportunity of maintaining the grave in a dignified and respectful state despite their best endeavours. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]