Search for: "Bird v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 1,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 6:14 pm by Eric Goldman
It says “Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent any State from enforcing any State law that is consistent with this section. [read post]
31 May 2022, 1:14 pm
The California statute says that the state is allowed to list as endangered any "native species or subspecies of a bird, mammal, fish, amphibian, reptile, or plant. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Lummi Nation (Fishing Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 3:20 pm by Native American Rights Fund
  State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlPhillip v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 8:56 am by Chiara Gallo
 EventsEleonora Rosati invited the IPKat readers to join her on the 1st December at Bird&Bird in Brussels for the event entitled “Technological governance at the crossroads: the present and future of EU copyright law”. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 10:59 am by Axel Arnbak
The NSA and GCHQ piggyback on Angry Birds to spy on its users. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm by Sophia Cope
This month, the California Supreme Court said “no” in the case Hassell v. [read post]