Search for: "Bird v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 599
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
United States dissent, Congress could delegate fact-finding to the Executive Branch, but not “policy judgments. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mayor of City of New York v Brady, 115 NY 599, 617 [1889]; United States v Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 68 [1878]), or part of a “larger fraudulent scheme” (Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The dismissed federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Meridian, the defendant, describes itself as “an innovator and industry leader in [bird removal and wildlife management] services with extensive experience assisting commercial clients throughout the United States with interior bird removal, exterior bird population reduction, wildlife relocation, nest removal and full facility inspection services. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied the plaintiff’s petition for an appeal. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But one claim can proceed—the one asserting that China hoarded personal-protective equipment (e.g., masks) and then sold lower-quality stuff to the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Something to bear in mind regarding this class action on behalf of everyone in the United States whose blood contains 0.05 parts per trillion or more of per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)—a class that comprises everyone in the United States. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
USA (Bristol Bay Pebble Mine; Clean Water Act; state sovereignty) Four petitions for certiorari were denied on 10/2/2023: Bird Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“Allegations regarding an act of deceit or intent to deceive must be stated with particularity” (Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 164 AD3d 635, 637, affd 35 NY3d 173; see Palmieri v Perry, Van Etten, Rozanski & Primavera, LLP, 200 AD3d at 785). [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm by Unknown
Lummi Nation (Fishing Treaty Rights) United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
On August 29, 2023, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 12:09 pm by Joseph Koncelik
On August 29, 2023, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 9:16 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
In a press release, Panasonic stated it expects ‘relevant actions will develop and proceed in parallel in Germany, the United Kingdom (UK), the newly established European Unified Patent Court (UPC) and China’. [read post]
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 6:05 am by Whitney Gravelle
Canada and the United States have an obligation to respect and protect human rights. [read post]