Search for: "Bird v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 611
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Andrew Willinger
The dissenters stated that they would treat as a proverbial duck any “bird that walks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am by Jeff Welty
The Supreme Court’s big Second Amendment case this term was United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:14 pm by Ryan E. Long
In a recent decision from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the court found that wholly created AI works cannot be copyrighted. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 8:18 am by Eric Goldman
Rachel Levine, the United States Assistant Secretary for Health and a transgender woman, with text that reads: “‘I’m an expert on mental health and food disorders. [read post]
4 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Let me begin by stating that my views are my own as a Commissioner and not necessarily those of the U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 9:02 pm by Rodger Citron
Cohn, a brilliant, corrupt attorney, first made his name as a prosecutor in the infamous Cold War espionage case, United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
The treatment of a foreign state like a domestic state captures the fact that both are governing units with similar inherent functions and powers. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Shea Denning
Three years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Narintohn Luangrath
United States dissent, Congress could delegate fact-finding to the Executive Branch, but not “policy judgments. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 4:44 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Mayor of City of New York v Brady, 115 NY 599, 617 [1889]; United States v Throckmorton, 98 US 61, 68 [1878]), or part of a “larger fraudulent scheme” (Newin Corp. v Hartford Acc. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 9:03 pm by Dan Flynn
The dismissed federal case of The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 4:00 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Meridian, the defendant, describes itself as “an innovator and industry leader in [bird removal and wildlife management] services with extensive experience assisting commercial clients throughout the United States with interior bird removal, exterior bird population reduction, wildlife relocation, nest removal and full facility inspection services. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 2:33 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
On July 14, 2020, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit denied the plaintiff’s petition for an appeal. [read post]