Search for: "Birmingham v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 279
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 2:00 am
Jonathan Grossberg (Thomson Reuters), Kerry Inger (Auburn; Google Scholar) & Carneil Wilson (Dentons Sirote, Birmingham, AL), Moore v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:40 am
Regina (Clue) v Birmingham City Council and Others Court of Appeal “A local authority was not entitled to decide how the Secretary of State for the Home Department might dispose of an application for leave to remain in the United Kingdom. [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 8:18 am
The recent decision in Birmingham City Council v Forde [2009] EWHC 12 (QB) is a worrying one both for Defendants and for the legal profession generally. [read post]
13 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 5:00 pm
Investigators with a specialized law enforcement unit burst into a storefront on 9th Street North in Birmingham, where officials say the location was a front for illegal gaming. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 11:56 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2013, 7:02 am
Roy is a Trial Attorney, Antitrust Division, United States Department of Justice. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
The article states that Homewood's narcotics unit, tactical team and special operations unit carried out a search warrant on the hotel room. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 11:57 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
In, United States v. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 5:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:00 pm
In United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 9:48 am
A recent study by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) ranks Birmingham in the top 10 most violent cities in the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2014, 8:17 am
United States v. [read post]
20 May 2021, 2:30 am
Birmingham argued that M v Newham had been wrongly decided, and that the duty was only to secure accommodation within a reasonable period of time. [read post]
