Search for: "Bishop v. Schofield" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Mar 2013, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
The Episcopal Church moved for summary judgment, arguing that because all the property transfers occurred after Schofield was removed as Bishop, the transfers were invalid. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:54 pm
It goes back to the Schofield decision to ascertain just what those "neutral principles" are:As the Schofield Court recognized:These neutral principles include First Amendment rights of individuals and corporations (see Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:36 pm
I described that occasion, in which I participated on behalf of Bishop Schofield, in this post. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
(At least the lawsuit calls him by his proper ecclesiastical title -- unlike the lawsuit which ECUSA's attorneys filed against Bishop Schofield in San Joaquin.) [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:19 pm
In the words of the Fifth District Appellate Court in Schofield v. [read post]
8 Jun 2013, 2:22 pm
The Presiding Bishop called its initial convention in April 2008 so that it could immediately file a lawsuit against Bishop Schofield (but not naming his Anglican Diocese -- remember, ECUSA cannot recognize the right of a diocese to withdraw, without forfeiting its claims to the withdrawing diocese's property and bank accounts).After five years, the group's lawsuit against Bishop Schofield has yet to go to trial, while it has accepted loans and subsidies… [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 9:25 am
Against Bishop John David Schofield and the diocesan investment fund in the Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin, CA (ACNA); Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin, The Rt. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 7:04 am
For some time now -- ever since ECUSA's unilateral decision to consecrate V. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 8:19 am
And when the correspondence to Bishop Schofield leaked in July 2006, Mr. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 1:44 pm
Against Bishop John David Schofield and the diocesan investment fund in the Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin, CA (ACNA); Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin, The Rt. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
Not content to have been the author of the wholly fictitious legal reasoning behind Roe v. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:09 pm
Against Bishop John David Schofield and the diocesan investment fund in the Anglican Diocese of San Joaquin, CA (ACNA); Episcopal Diocese of San Joaquin, The Rt. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 12:34 pm
As such, he participated in the proceedings against Bishops Schofield and Duncan for so-called "abandonment of communion", which resulted in their faux "deposition" by a tiny minority of the full membership of the House of Bishops who are actually entitled to vote under ECUSA's Constitution, notwithstanding what the vindictive Presiding Bishop or her financially very interested Chancellor chooses to opine. [read post]