Search for: "Bishop v. United States" Results 221 - 240 of 428
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2014, 4:48 pm
Your Curmudgeon has just received reliable word that ECUSA and its attorneys intend to ask the United States Supreme Court to review the (interlocutory!) [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
  Perhaps a set of basic governance devices as models would serve a useful purpose as well.In any case, this has been a long time coming in the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:40 am by Stephen Page
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA MARY BISHOP, ) SHARON BALDWIN, ) SUSAN BARTON, and ) GAY PHILLIPS, ) ) Plaintiffs, )) v. ) No. 04-CV-848-TCK-TLW ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ex rel. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:49 pm by Lyle Denniston
  He ruled that the Supreme Court’s ruling last Term in United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 3:15 pm by Ruthann Robson
Professor Ruthann Robson, City University of New York (CUNY) School of Law In a lengthy opinion today in Bishop v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:23 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 The practice is far from universally accepted, despite the momentum that the civil rights has garnered over the past 24-months, especially in the wake of the SCOTUS's seminal United States v Windsor decision. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 4:00 am by Administrator
ABlawg.caEighty Percent Of Success Is Showing Up: Or “How A Pro Se Farmer Won A Default Against The United States In His Suit To Invalidate The Permit For Half Of Keystone Xl (& Why It Probably Won’t Last)”Case commented on: Bishop v Bostick, 9:13-cv-00082, (E.D. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
” Corp. of Presiding Bishop of Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
 Is this, asks Merpel, the first time an appeal in any IP proceedings in the United Kingdom has been dealt with by a predominantly female tribunal? [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
  The Supreme Court absolutely got it right in Employment Div. v. [read post]