Search for: "Bishop v. United States"
Results 241 - 260
of 391
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2013, 9:01 pm
While the bishops and evangelicals have fought Roe v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
United States), and religion (Bishop Fred Pickerling, Danny Noonan). [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm
United States), and religion (Bishop Fred Pickerling, Danny Noonan). [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am
Nearly three years ago, Justice Alito found himself in the center of a controversy when President Obama in his speech criticized the Court’s (then) recently issued decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
17 Jan 2013, 4:00 am
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops, (1st Cir., Jan. 15, 2013), the U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals remanded with instructions to dismiss as moot a suit brought in 2009 alleging that the U.S. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm
Sebelius that the ACLUM's Establishment Clause challenge to a government contract with the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops was moot after the contract expired and after the USCCB failed... [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 1:56 pm
In his 1787 Defense of the Constitutions of the United States he elaborates on this point: “If in England there has ever been such a thing as a government of laws, was it not magna charta? [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 7:51 am
United States. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 2:22 pm
Northwest Environmental Defense Center, argued this morning in the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
9 Nov 2012, 5:31 am
Now that the country will resume its path to deliberate degradation and decay, it is time to return for a look at the parallel path which the Episcopal Church in the United States of America (ECUSA) is taking. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:52 am
This “contraception mandate” has generated a huge outcry from some religious leaders, most notably the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 11:13 am
It has adopted that line of argument in order to avoid the application of "neutral principles of law", as endorsed by the United States Supreme Court in Jones v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 12:35 pm
The trial court ruled against the parish in 2010, the Connecticut Supreme Court upheld the trial court's decision in September 2011, and the United States Supreme Court declined to review that decision earlier this year.The opinion by the Supreme Court of Connecticut is a travesty of justice -- it nonsensically reads the United States Supreme Court's majority decision in Jones v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 6:34 am
From this caldron emerged the famous Footnote 4 in the 1938 case of United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Shaffer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Shaffer v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 2:00 am
Shaffer v. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 6:39 pm
Many other Bishops may not be aware of it just now, but they are going to face plenty of storms in their own dioceses after they return.This is not like General Convention 2003, when people had to read the news about the confirmation of V. [read post]
