Search for: "Bishop v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 465
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jan 2017, 7:51 am by Doug Cornelius
The Constitutional question is whether the SEC’s ALJs are “Officers of the United States,” including principal and inferior officers, who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 9:07 am by Aidan O'Neill QC, Matrix.
The Ministerial exception in US case law On 28 March 2011 the United States Supreme Court granted certiorari in Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Perich v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm by David Kopel
  Federal and State Military Forces of TodayThe United States Armed ForcesThe National GuardState Defense ForcesThe Unorganized Militia  Chapter 5The Right to Arms, Militias, and Slavery in the Early Republic and Antebellum Periods A. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 8:36 am by WIMS
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions   <> Organized Village of Kake v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 10:07 pm
United States District Court, 503 U.S. 653 (1992) .................................................4 Gregg v. [read post]
13 Nov 2012, 11:54 am
Many courts, including the United States Supreme Court, have recognized a private cause of action for violation of NASD and NYSE Rules, including a private cause of action for andldquo;the failure to supervise.andrdquo;andnbsp; See, e.g., Cook v. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am by David Pocklington
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am by Frank Cranmer
The biggest legal news of the week was almost certainly the judgment of the Supreme Court in R (AAA (Syria) & Ors) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2023] UKSC 42, in which the Court held unanimously that the Secretary of State’s policy of sending asylum-seekers to Rwanda was unlawful. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am by LindaMBeale
Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990), is a United States Supreme Court case that determined that the state could deny unemployment benefits to a person fired for violating a state prohibition on the use of peyote, even though the use of the drug was part of a religious ritual. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Board here was correct in finding broadcast-incidental copying engages the reproduction right, consistent with Bishop v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Alexander Dushku and R. Shawn Gunnarson
” In a unanimous decision in Corporation of the Presiding Bishop of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:00 am by J. Francisco Lobo
Though always mindful of the risk of disproportionate reactions, Ruys provides evidence (albeit not unequivocal according to him) that several states in addition to Israel have relied on this doctrine in the past, including the United States, Russia, China, Lebanon, Iran, Iraq, Liberia and Sudan. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 3:07 pm by Lyle Denniston
For the new birth control cases, it is important to emphasize at the outset that, while religious freedom in the United States often becomes a constitutional dispute, the Court has chosen not to consider any of the current round of protests based on a constitutional claim. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
In 1853, Charles Bishop Goodrich published The Science of Government: As Exhibited in the Institutions of the United States, a popular early treatise on US government. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 7:25 am by Stephen Wermiel
Nearly three years ago, Justice Alito found himself in the center of a controversy when President Obama in his speech criticized the Court’s (then) recently issued decision in Citizens United v. [read post]