Search for: "Bivins v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 23
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
The trick, as regular readers well know, is to remove the case before plaintiff serves the resident defendant, thus avoiding the prohibition on removing cases in which a resident defendant has been joined and served.The new case is Bivins v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 4:46 pm by moderator
State of Tennessee]Judge Jeffrey Bivins affirmed the post-conviction court's refusal to grant relief on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 9:20 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The reason for this is while the Supreme Court said in the Bivins case in 1971 that you can sue the federal government for certain constitutional claims, the Court has actually recognized only a handful of ways you can bring these cases.The case is Atterbury v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:34 am by Chris Seaton
So the Tennessee Supreme Court is really interested in making sure the mandate of Gideon v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:31 am by thejaghunter
Morgan making a cell phone call to state officials, during which he made a police report of the incident to Sergeant Kevin Smith of the Tennessee Highway Patrol. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:54 am by Bexis
March 27, 2010) (removal before service allowed forum defendant to be ignored).New Jersey:  Bivins v. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:11 am by Chris Seaton
Current Chief Justice Jeff Bivins understands there are major problems with the current system. [read post]