Search for: "Black v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 9,156
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2008, 1:26 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice Court of Appeal “Section 35 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State for Justice power to block the release on licence of prisoners sentenced between 1991 and 2003 to prison terms of more than 15 years, was not compatible with article 5.4 of the European Convention on Human Rights, providing that anyone deprived of his liberty had the right to have the lawfulness of his detention… [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 11:52 am by Daily Record Staff
Black was sentenced to life imprisonment with all ... [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 2:34 am
Regina (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice House of Lords “The provision requiring lawfulness of detention to be determined by a court was not infringed when the Secretary of State for Justice rather than the Parole Board determined whether certain long-term prisoners should be released on licence. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 2:13 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice [2009] UKHL 1; [2009] WLR (D) 19 “S 35(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, in allowing the Secretary of State for Justice rather than the Parole Board to determine whether certain long-term prisoners should be released on licence at the half-way stage of their sentence, did not [...] [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:39 am
R (Black) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 359; [2008] WLR (D) 114 “S 35(1) of the Criminal Justice Act 1991, giving the Secretary of State power to override a Parole Board recommendation for the release on parole of a prisoner serving a sentence of more than 15 years, was not compatible with art 5(4) of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 7:58 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Confrontation clause — Questions related to state witness’ credibility We are asked to determine whether the trial court erred when it: (1) granted the State’s request to advise a defense witness of his Fifth Amendment rights; (2) and limited appellant Marcus Black’s cross-examination of a State’s witness. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 8:53 pm
In honor of Black History of Month, I thought it would be good to highlight the case of Strauder v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 7:50 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Personhuballah, a case testing whether a state's move to pack black voters into a congressional district supposedly to comply with Section 5... [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:01 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Black maintains the court should have followed the principle derived from Begay v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am by Heather Douglas
Speaking truth to power by stating that sometimes police over-react when dealing with Black youth. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 7:01 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Internet searches In March 2017, E.M. met Colin Black, appellant, using the online dating app “Tinder. [read post]