Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 261 - 280 of 3,477
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2019, 11:12 am
Picasso case (United States District Court for the Northern District of California). [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
Barnette, No. 591, Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1942, at 46. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
“Kansas’s arguments ignore the reality of license suspension practices in the United States, and the dangers of suspicionless stops to drivers of color, particularly black drivers. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:01 am by Kalvis Golde
It is our experience that current constitutional law doctrines are best understood as the result of a 200+ year process of decision-making by a single court: the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 1:15 am by Chris Carey
Although sales of hemp-based CBD products in the United States were well under $1 billion in 2018, some market research firms have projected that total revenue could reach or exceed $20 billion by the middle of the decade. [read post]
26 Sep 2019, 1:15 am by Chris Carey
Although sales of hemp-based CBD products in the United States were well under $1 billion in 2018, some market research firms have projected that total revenue could reach or exceed $20 billion by the middle of the decade. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 6:47 am by Unknown author
The United States Patent and Trademark Office specifies what cannot be patented, including among other things: laws of nature, natural phenomena, abstract ideas, and inventions that are offensive. [read post]
20 Sep 2019, 8:00 am by Ronald Collins
For example, there is Justice Hugo Black’s generous application of originalism in his dissent in Adamson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 9:56 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 7:56 am by Alicia Maule
Ritchie and Kay Whitlock Race and the Death Penalty: The Legacy of “McCleskey v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 1:26 am by CMS
Lord Keen QC submits that this reasoning was disregarded by the Inner House in favour of an inference. 15:52: Lady Black asked if Parliament could have decided not to go into recess. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 9:06 am by Matthew Davie
The issues were: (1) whether ECHR Article 8 was engaged; (2) whether the SWP’s activities were “in accordance with the law”; and (3) whether the SWP’s activities were “necessary in a democratic society” in the interests of one of the objectives stated in Article 8(2), in accordance with the four-part test set out by the UK Supreme Court in Bank Mellat v Her Majesty’s Treasury (No 2) [2014] AC 700. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:28 am by CMS
In England & Wales, Gina Millar (the businesswoman who brought the UK Supreme Court appeal of R (on the application of Miller and another) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5) also raised proceedings, following the Queen’s signing of the Order in Council. [read post]