Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 441 - 460 of 4,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2023, 1:29 pm by Farrah Nagrampa
Wainwright, significantly changing the face of criminal law in the United States. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 9:30 pm by ernst
Gorewitz and 'Change of Neighborhood' in the NAACP’s Restrictive Covenant Cases, which is forthcoming in the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 55 (2020):Racially restrictive covenants flourished throughout the United States in the early twentieth century. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm by Shea Denning
Third, the United States Supreme Court winds up its term, invariably deciding significant criminal law cases the very week of the conference. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am by Marty Lederman
Within days, every important state boxing commission in the nation had followed suit, effectively preventing Ali from fighting in the United States. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 1:56 pm by Unknown
United States (Endangered Species Act; Yellowstone Grizzlies)Dossett v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm by Shea Denning
Third, the United States Supreme Court winds up its term, invariably deciding significant criminal law cases the very week of the conference. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
But most unforgivably, Judge Waring opened the all-white Democratic Primary in South Carolina to blacks with his ruling in Elmore v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 1:06 pm by Blake Marcus
Coupled with the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois v. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 5:51 am by Jonathan Witmer-Rich
  The first court decision discussing a delayed notice search warrant—that is to say, a covert search actually authorized in advance by a magistrate—is United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 11:08 am
Individual rather than the court responsible for identifying the "cause of action"Zimmer v Secretary of Department of Homeland Security, USCA, 3rd Circuit, Docket #08-1590, October 22, 2008 [not precedential]Lawrence Zimmer appealed an order by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, that dismissed his employment discrimination complaint "for failing to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28… [read post]
15 Mar 2014, 11:14 am by Schachtman
  The Canadian court held that risk sufficed, and it went further, contrary to the majority of courts in the United States, to hold that a 40% reduction in risk sufficed to satisfy the more-likely-than-not standard. [read post]