Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 541 - 560
of 4,816
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
“Kansas’s arguments ignore the reality of license suspension practices in the United States, and the dangers of suspicionless stops to drivers of color, particularly black drivers. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 10:48 am
See US v. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 7:43 pm
United States. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 2:55 am
After the Elk v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:26 pm
United States (Sovereign Immunity; Federal Torts Claim Act)State Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2020.htmlPeople in Interest of K.C. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
The plaintiff in Cruz v. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 6:06 pm
Goodman v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:12 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
Cir. 1994) (finding Garland dicta not controlling); United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 12:52 pm
Cir. 1994) (finding Garland dicta not controlling); United States v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
Justice Black’s lead opinion in Oregon v. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 3:36 pm
In an unpublished opinion in the case of State v. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 1:58 pm
[6.18.2020] In what will likely be seen as a landmark decision for years to come, on Monday, June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down an opinion in the case Bostock v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 4:51 am
Franchise Tax Bd., 105 AD3d at 205; see United States v Doe, 429 F3d 450, 453 [3d Cir 2005]; F.D.I.C. v Ogden Corp., 202 F3d 454, 461 [1st Cir 2000]). [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
The United States is far from a truly free nation; nor are any other nations. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 10:17 am
Holder v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:45 pm
He quoted Jones v Mayer, a case upholding the Civil Rights Act of 1866 (codified at § 1981), but he replaced the phrase "black man" with "[any person]" and focused solely on the contracts aspect of the Act. [read post]
