Search for: "Black v. United States"
Results 881 - 900
of 4,626
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2014, 4:56 am
Section 798(a)(3) states that[w]hoever knowingly and willfully communicates, furnishes, transmits, or otherwise makes available to an unauthorized person, or publishes, or uses in any manner prejudicial to the safety or interest of the United States or for the benefit of any foreign government to the detriment of the United States any classified information ... concerning the communication intelligence activities of the United… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”), in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”), in Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 2:06 pm
The United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”), in Dobbs v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:38 am
Later in 1968 Stokes was elected to the United States Congress and served 15 consecutive terms in the U.S. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 5:46 pm
See United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am
" How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
United States Gov't & His Religion, 2015 U.S. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 5:01 am
As the Brennan Center has noted, state critical infrastructure laws borrow from the federal concept of critical infrastructure: segments of the economy “so vital to the United States that their incapacitation or destruction would have a debilitating effect” on national security and public safety, thereby deserving enhanced legislative protection. [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 8:26 am
United States. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:35 am
More than a dozen such motions were brought on Monday in Boston’s federal jury trial of United States vs. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:38 am
Simply put, Section 5 stated that if any jurisdiction wanted to make changes to laws relevant to voting, it first must have that aspiration upheld by the authority of the Attorney General of the United States or a three judge panel of the U.S. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 10:04 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 4:52 pm
Black, 767 F.2d 1334, 1342 (9th Cir.1985); Fed.R.Evid. 901(a); United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:39 am
United States, 77 Fed.Cl. 126, 131 (2007) (action on application is required); La Resolana Architects, PA v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 4:54 am
It heard oral arguments for the second time in Johnson v. [read post]
29 Jun 2013, 11:54 am
Generally speaking, in the United States the view of what is patent eligible is quite broad. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
“Even many black, brown, and beige people, in the United States and throughout the world, make the same conclusions. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
On Wednesday, April 22, in Ricci v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
