Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 981 - 1000 of 4,815
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Both casesare brought by a non-profit organization long committed to ending all affirmative action in the United States. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
The clerk is enforcing Kentucky law as written by its people represented through its legislature, not as five unelected jurists in black robes say by fiat that Kentucky law must be.The Supreme Court's majority opinion in Obergefell v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am by jonathanturley
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 8:12 am
From Russ Bensing at The Briefcase comes the news that Ohio's 8th District Court of Appeals affirmed a suppression motion in State v. [read post]
Lady Black’s judgment Lady Black extensively reviewed the authorities, beginning with the landmark judgments of the House of Lords in   In re F (Mental Patient: Sterilisation) [1990] 2 AC and Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
In October 1945, during her second year at Columbia Law School, future United States Supreme Court Associate Justice Thurgood Marshall hired her as a law clerk. [read post]
9 May 2022, 10:00 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
  In other words, it is almost always the case that children available for public adoption in the United States were forcibly taken from families in Black, Indigenous, and impoverished white communities. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by Guest Barista
Copyright Law when they were imported into the United States. [read post]
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
22 May 2017, 3:01 pm by Richard Pildes
The first stages were the Alabama cases in 2015, Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 7:46 pm by Perry Herzfeld
This was said to infringe the act of state doctrine, as explained in decisions such as that of the United States Supreme Court in Underhill v Hernandez 168 US 250 (1897) and the House of Lords in Buttes Gas and Oil Co v Hammer [1982] AC 888. [read post]