Search for: "Black v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 4,271
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2011, 1:33 pm by WIMS
Appealed from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Warley, the Supreme Court invalidated a Louisville residential segregation law, one of a wave of such laws spreading through the United States. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 7:30 am by Dan Ernst
James Gray Pope, Rutgers Law School, Newark, has posted Snubbed Landmark: How United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:28 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
United States [docket; cert. petition, PDF] the question presented is: "Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 4:55 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
Further, even if the judgment is not enforceable in the United States, it is enforceable in Ontario, and there is also value in the vindication of a defamation judgment regardless of the ability to collect damages. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:26 am
According to this Appeals Chamber decision in the case of Prosecutor v. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by Edward Smith
Woman Sues Hotel in Spider Bite Incident Black widows are considered one of the most poisonous spiders in the United States. [read post]
16 May 2014, 7:14 pm by Maureen Johnston
United States 13-983 Issue: Whether, consistent with the First Amendment and Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 2:49 am by NCC Staff
The committee said it was clear, to it, that “the 14th amendment to the Constitution has no effect whatever upon the status of the Indian tribes within the limits of the United States,” but that “straggling Indians” were subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:15 am by Ashley Sloat
The United States Supreme Court is set to hear opening arguments in Amgen Inc. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 3:19 pm by Amy Howe
However, Acting Solicitor General Brian Fletcher added, any testimony by Zayn Husayn, also known as Abu Zubaydah, would be subject to a national-security review, and it would not resolve the dispute over whether testimony by two CIA contractors who supervised the CIA’s torture program is protected by the “state secrets” privilege – the question at the center of United States v. [read post]