Search for: "Blackburn v. Blackburn" Results 101 - 120 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In Matter of Blackburne, 211 AD2d 13, [motion to appeal denied, 86 N.Y.2d 705], the Appellate Division opined that an individual otherwise entitled to an "administrative due process disciplinary hearing” such as one provided by a Taylor Law collective bargaining agreement [CBA] or by state law, may be summarily removed from his or her position under certain conditions. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In Matter of Blackburne, 211 AD2d 13, [motion to appeal denied, 86 N.Y.2d 705], the Appellate Division opined that an individual otherwise entitled to an "administrative due process disciplinary hearing” such as one provided by a Taylor Law collective bargaining agreement [CBA] or by state law, may be summarily removed from his or her position under certain conditions. [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 5:15 am
On January 16th, 2008, the Tenth Circuit published its opinion in New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 1:55 pm by randal shaheen
In a much anticipated decision, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently held in Stauffer v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:30 am by SHG
  Colorado District Court Judge Robert Blackburn has issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  The Ontario courts have followed the UK decision of Letterstedt v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 2:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
  The Ontario courts have followed the UK decision of Letterstedt v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 11:26 am by By Rose Saxe, AIDS Project
Our new plaintiffs are Ellen ("Lennie") Gerber and Pearl Berlin, Lyn McCoy and Jane Blackburn, and Esmerelda Mejia and Christina Ginter-Mejia. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 12:26 pm by Liisa Speaker
Citing Mayor of Cadillac v Blackburn, 306 Mich App 512, 522; 857 NW2d 529 (2014), the Court of Appeals concluded that because relevant statutes do not state which standard of evidence a Probate Court should require for the removal of a guardian, the default standard of a preponderance of the evidence should be applied. [read post]