Search for: "Blake, in Re"
Results 1 - 20
of 919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2008, 8:59 pm
Both merit re-reading as a fitting celebration of their birth and jurisprudential development. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:33 pm
Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake on Friday announced that she would not seek re-election. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 1:08 pm
Isn’t it funny that we can feel a profound sadness when people we don’t know announce they’re divorcing? [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 6:41 pm
That is, from my particular corn field, Blakely looks a lot like In re Winship for sentencing facts. [read post]
4 Dec 2004, 9:47 am
Rule 12(B); see also In re Morton, 770 N.E.2d 827, 831 (Ind. 2002) (under Judicial Canon 3(E)(1), judge's impartiality could reasonably be questioned where he initiated a criminal investigation). [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 10:24 am
Once again we're reporting on a celebrity punitive damages case. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 10:17 am
In 2008, multiple class action lawsuits from around the country were consolidated into one mega case called In re Packaged Ice Antitrust Litig., No. 7-md-1952 (E.D. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 6:50 am
After weeks of being buffeted for her leadership of the city during April’s civil unrest, Baltimore Mayor Stephanie-Rawlings Blake said this morning she will not seek re-election, a stunning announcement that throws the upcoming mayor’s campaign into a wide-open contest. [read post]
13 Oct 2006, 12:46 pm
Then, when a trial court misinforms someone that they are waiving they're right to appeal, there has been no voluntary, knowing, or intelligent waiver of the right to appeal a sentence. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:04 am
We’re going to post two interviews with David Lowery and Blake Morgan about their impressions on SXSW from an artist rights advocacy point of view. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 2:22 pm
Baltimore Mayor Stephanie Rawlings-Blake’s unexpected announcement that she’s not seeking re-election caught business leaders off guard, but some are now wondering if that decision presents an opportunity to get behind a candidate sympathetic to their needs. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 8:43 am
Why, if you're determining that sentences run consecutively, isn't that just the same as looking at a simultaneous conviction and saying they're going to run consecutively? [read post]
4 May 2021, 1:50 am
v=jIXwIvQ-Ve0I think, Rosie Pope, a British-American entrepreneur and businesswoman, said it best: “If you’re a mom, you’re a superhero. [read post]
30 Nov 2006, 10:15 am
Another helpful reader has sent me this report on a notable state Blakely ruling in In re Personal Restraint of VanDelft, No. 77733-1 (Wash. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 11:49 am
Part I of this Article looks at Blakely and its predecessors, and reviews how this line of cases has re-focused our attentions on the origins and legitimacy of facts in sentencing. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:03 am
Bobby Blake Newton v. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 9:59 am
Michael Limrick, a frequent commentator on Indiana sentencing law issues, has written the lengthy lead article for the upcoming JulyAugust issue of Res Gestae. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:42 am
Part I of this Article looks at Blakely and its predecessors, and reviews how this line of cases has re-focused our attentions on the origins and legitimacy of facts in sentencing. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 7:14 am
With Senator Marsha Blackburn and Karoline Kramer Gould Blake, you’re back in Washington! [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
"I was so upset that judges were on the take, and I said, 'Sometimes, if you're not part of the solution, you're part of the problem.' " Elected in 1994, he took the bench the following January. [read post]
