Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 976
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2013, 9:58 am
Because the State could not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the shackling did not contribute to the verdict - the standard under the US Supreme Court's ruling in Deck v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 5:55 am
6 Nov 2011, 10:30 am
The style of the case is John Earl Bullard v. [read post]
15 Nov 2006, 6:51 am
[No petition for review filed].Blake Cooper, a Reno County public defender, won in State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:01 am
State v. [read post]
3 Mar 2005, 7:53 pm
As many of you are aware of, Judge Gertner had been treating the guidelines as advisory since her post-Blakely decision in United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:56 am
Will the United States Supreme Court’s decision on Halliburton impact Canadian securities class actions? [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
Hall v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:16 pm
To listen to the full episode, and get access to all exclusive CAFE Insider content, including the newly launched United Security and Cyber Space podcasts, try out the membership free for two weeks: www.cafe.com/insider Sign up to receive the weekly CAFE Brief newsletter, featuring analysis by Elie Honig: www.cafe.com/brief REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
25 Mar 2017, 9:17 pm
Bernardo Sepúlveda-Amor & Merryl Lawry-White, State responsibility and the enforcement of arbitral awards Philip Chong & Blake Primrose, Summary judgment in international arbitrations seated in England Recent DevelopmentsJohn Gaffney, Should the European Union regulate commercial arbitration? [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:27 pm
" The Second District stated that the "circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to apply the principle espoused in Blake v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
As a result of Blakely v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:21 pm
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
" This ruling came in State v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:13 am
Ice, which explores whether the Apprendi/Blakely rule limiting judicial fact-finding at sentencing extends to determinations required under state law for the imposition of consecutive sentences. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:19 am
Washington, 2004, limiting admission of out-of-court statemens by absent witnesses; Burton is about retroactivity of Blakely v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
Blake, supra(quoting State v. [read post]
