Search for: "Blake v. State"
Results 201 - 220
of 923
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2005, 7:53 pm
As many of you are aware of, Judge Gertner had been treating the guidelines as advisory since her post-Blakely decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 6:21 am
A shudder went through the state, and the state supreme court in People v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 5:27 pm
" The Second District stated that the "circuit court departed from the essential requirements of law by failing to apply the principle espoused in Blake v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 10:00 am
Hall v. [read post]
9 Oct 2004, 3:46 pm
As a result of Blakely v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 11:55 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:21 pm
Here is the abstract: In United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2008, 2:13 am
Ice, which explores whether the Apprendi/Blakely rule limiting judicial fact-finding at sentencing extends to determinations required under state law for the imposition of consecutive sentences. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am
Blake, supra(quoting State v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 9:19 am
Washington, 2004, limiting admission of out-of-court statemens by absent witnesses; Burton is about retroactivity of Blakely v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 3:16 pm
To listen to the full episode, and get access to all exclusive CAFE Insider content, including the newly launched United Security and Cyber Space podcasts, try out the membership free for two weeks: www.cafe.com/insider Sign up to receive the weekly CAFE Brief newsletter, featuring analysis by Elie Honig: www.cafe.com/brief REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: State of Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 7:28 am
" This ruling came in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:37 am
Blake. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 3:34 am
That’s exactly what happened in State v. [read post]
23 Jan 2007, 12:41 pm
The panel notes that it can't address United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm
Telecom Ass’n v. [read post]
15 Jun 2006, 4:45 am
United Kingdom and previously held to be correct as a matter of international law by a number of American and English judges (Siderman de Blake v. [read post]
