Search for: "Blakely v. Washington" Results 61 - 80 of 222
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2006, 7:50 am
  Though much can be said about the substance of the arguments--particularly Cunningham v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 11:03 am by Steve
Blake McKinney, of Washington, as a judge of the Twenty-eighth Judicial District for a term of six years commencing July 1, 2012.Clarence E. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 2:13 am
Murillo, 422 F.3d 1152 (9th Cir. 2005) where, under a Washington statute, the 9th concluded that a stat max is the one set by statute and not by guidelines in a 922(g) case, even under Blakely. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:38 pm by Timothy P. Flynn
Scalia's majority opinion was very useful in the ultimate habeas corpus petition filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan.Another example of Scalia's handiwork in the realm of the constitutional rights of the accused is his dissent in the 2000 case of Apprendi v New Jersey, which ripened into a majority opinion 4-years later in Blakely v Washington, holding that a judge cannot fashion a sentence based on facts that… [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:39 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Of course, those "tired arguments" were eventually accepted by the Supreme Court in Apprendi v New Jersey (530 US 466 [2000]), Blakely v Washington (542 US 296 [2004]) and Cunningham v California (549 US 270 [2007]). [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 12:33 pm
  (I suppose "interesting" isn't quite the right word for it when a new case requires a massive rewrite -- as happened to me when the Supreme Court decided Blakely v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:34 pm by Kali Borkoski
More blog coverage comes from  Aaron Blake at the Washington Post’s The Fix blog, Bill Mears at CNN’s Political Ticker blog, and Ilya Shapiro of Cato@Liberty. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 12:46 pm
Finally, Doug Berman has this post at Sentencing Law & Policy about how Bockting might apply to Apprendi or Blakely. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 1:20 pm
Stewart, in which the Court declined to rule on the question of whether the sentencing decision in Blakely v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 6:43 pm
New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000), and Blakely v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm by LTA-Editor
Editor in Chief Parker Howell wrote the third article, “Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating ‘Gray Markets’ After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. [read post]
2 Aug 2004, 7:26 am
in Penaranda, as well as the petition for rehearing in Blakely v. [read post]