Search for: "Bland v. State" Results 201 - 220 of 403
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2006, 1:24 pm
In addition to Bland and Skalet, counsel for the plaintiffs in Watson v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:10 pm
The distinction between this bland chat about things Ashley Judd wrote in her memoir is nothing like the explosive conversation in Bartnicki v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:28 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
A portion of that law that regulates the centers' speech violates the First AmendmentThe case is The Evergreen Association v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 11:30 am by Joe Consumer
Yet by the majority’s lights, the very act of creating that requirement in order to “safeguard the consumer,”  United  States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am by Daniel Sokol
In its determination, the Court looked at s4 of the Mental Capacity Act (MCA) and authorities such as the landmark case of Airedale NHS Trust v Bland [1993] AC 789. s4 MCA 2005 states that, in determining best interests, all relevant circumstances should be considered, including the person’s past and present wishes and feelings, and the views of those close to him. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:30 am by Don Cruse
This first week marks the first argument sitting for Justice Busby and the first for Justice Bland since 2006, when she was chosen to sit by designation in a case that was re-argued after two of the regular justices had recused themselves (Hyundai Motor Company and Hyundai Motor America, Inc. v. [read post]