Search for: "Bland v. State" Results 261 - 280 of 407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
(See Brief, McQuillen v Check n' Go, Paul Bland) As Adrianne learned in her dispute with MBNA, NAF has different rules for consumers. [read post]
1 May 2012, 7:24 am by Sheldon Toplitt
So-called "symbolic speech" cases involve conduct through which the actor intends to convey a specific message and the audience reasonably understands the intended message.The concept is familiar to media law students, but apparently is lost on United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia Judge Raymond Jackson, who last week ruled in Bland v. [read post]
24 May 2014, 10:23 am by Betsy McKenzie
The United States is very unlikely to come up with any similar ruling, largely because of our First Amendment free speech legal tradition. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
As Senator Clinton knows, the wearing of bland pants suits can attract negative remarks because it seems to represent a masquerade of sorts -- a woman who dresses like a man even though she obviously is not a man. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:37 am
"It's worth noting, if only as an aside, that Zed's bland prayer was in fact consistent with monotheism. [read post]
23 May 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Mann
The Supreme Court confirmed that regime in its 1957 decision in Fourco Glass v Transmirra Products. [read post]
6 Oct 2013, 12:43 pm by Kevin Shah
In a decision that expands the First Amendment’s definition of protectable speech, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held in Bland v. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:19 am by Josh Blackman
(Without comment, the court this week also denied a second case on the same issue, an appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, Dalberiste v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 8:27 am by Venkat Balasubramani
"] Other aspects of the dispute that had intersting and recurring social media tweaks: other public employee cases have raised the similar issue of whether the employee was speaking as a citizen or an employee; the law is employer-favorable, but I would not be surprised to see an appeals court give her another chance (this aspect of the dispute vaguely reminds me of Bland v. [read post]