Search for: "Bland v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 379
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Wade v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
In Goins v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 12:37 pm
Bland, Note, There will be blood...testing: the intersection of professional sports and the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008, 13 VANDERBILT JOURNAL OF ENTERTAINMENT & TECHNOLOGY LAW 357 (2011) Joseph R. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:23 pm
A unit of state government is immune from suit and liability unless the state consents. [read post]
17 May 2011, 2:00 am
Last December, I reported on the Supreme Court of Kentucky's decision in Schnuerle v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 10:00 am
On Wednesday, the Court heard argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 5:48 am
Today, for example, it appears as if Americans are still concerned with debt, that people have mistakenly come to my article on Nic Cage's old legal problems in Germany due to his new legal problems in New Orleans, and that someone is doing a paper on Lucas v. the Forty-Fourth General Assembly of the State of Colorado. [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 8:36 am
The Supreme Court’s decision this week in Aruna Shanbaug v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:00 am
Bland, (10th Cir., Feb. 14, 2011), the 10th Circuit rejected an inmate's claim that his constitutional rights were violated when a state court refused to grant his petition to change his name for religious reasons to Ali Ishmael Mandingo Warrior Chief. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:24 am
Petitioner's Reply Paul Bland argued for the plaintiff on rebuttal. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 1:48 pm
(See, e.g., Board of Education of Kiryas Joel Village School District v. [read post]
13 Nov 2010, 8:56 pm
So much so that Golden State courts have struck down class-action bans that show up in consumer contracts whether they apply to lawsuits, Discover Bank v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:53 am
K&J had argued that a by the way statement made by Lord Templeman in Billson v Residential Apartments Ltd (No 1) [1992] 1 AC 494 to the effect that "I consider that the practice of ordering indemnity costs as a condition of granting relief is ripe for reconsideration" should be followed in preference to Chadwick LJ's statement of principle in Bland v Ingrams Estates Ltd (No 2) [2001] EWCA Civ 1088 at paragraph 14: "Third, the object of the court… [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 5:21 am
Here's the video of the American Constitution Society's panel discussion on AT&T v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 10:41 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 3:26 pm
Supreme Court in AT&T v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 10:58 pm
As was discussed in State v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 2:52 pm
Public Justice's Senior Attorney Paul Bland, Staff Attorney Claire Prestel and Brayton-Baron Fellow Melanie Hirsch explain what is at stake in ATT Mobility v. [read post]
