Search for: "Bland v. State"
Results 381 - 400
of 408
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
A recent graduate from Catholic University's School of Law, Elizabeth Getman, at the ripe old age of 27, is already serving as co-counsel to Andrew Herman of the Bland Law Group in DC as he argues the case of Jack Davis v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 1:27 am
KINGS COUNTYCivil Practice
Expiration of Limitations Period Denies Leave To File Late Notice of Claim on False Arrest Charge
Blanding v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 6:38 am
Last week, the Court handed Riegel v Medtronic, 128 S. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:13 pm
Bland, No. 06-3223 Conviction for bank robbery is affirmed where: 1) there was no Brady violation since evidence suppressed by the prosecution was not material to an issue at defendant's trial; and 2) the district court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to conduct an independent in camera review of the evidence in question. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
The leading case is Kemp v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
The North Carolina Cerebral Palsy Resource Guide contains resources for those with cerebral palsy within the State of North Carolina. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 12:01 pm
Box 1698 Jackson, MS 39215 Phone: (601) 987-4872 (V/TTY); (800) 852-8328 (V/TTY/Toll Free in MS) Web: http://www.msprojectstart.org T.K. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 6:16 pm
Banegas CA2/2 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 11:45 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 8:57 am
Supreme Court's decision in Buckeye Check Cashing v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 2:54 am
Examples: state action doctrine. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 1:23 pm
Access and the Regulatory State C. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 1:27 pm
I liked this article about the bell in the courthouse for Bland County.Here is the opinion from U.S. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 12:35 am
As Senator Clinton knows, the wearing of bland pants suits can attract negative remarks because it seems to represent a masquerade of sorts -- a woman who dresses like a man even though she obviously is not a man. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 1:37 am
"It's worth noting, if only as an aside, that Zed's bland prayer was in fact consistent with monotheism. [read post]
9 Jul 2007, 6:33 am
I wrote about the California Supreme Court's decision in The Oakland Raiders v. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 2:50 pm
[Co-authored by Paul Bland and Alexis Rickher] In a series of decisions stemming back about 20 years, the U.S. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 12:33 am
Board of Education) through 1973 (when it ruled on Roe v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:33 pm
The Court noticed this in Texas Monthly v. [read post]