Search for: "Bland v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 400
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2019, 11:45 am by Eric Goldman
Roberts * Facebook “Likes” Aren’t Speech Protected By the First Amendment–Bland v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:42 am
DiNapoli, Office of New York State Comptroller, on Sunday, June 16, 2019 Tags: Climate change, Environmental disclosure, ESG, Institutional Investors, New York, Pension funds, Stewardship, Sustainability Mootness Fees Posted by Steven Davidoff Solomon (University of California, Berkeley), on Monday, June 17, 2019 Tags: Class actions, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fairness review, Merger litigation, Mergers… [read post]
5 May 2019, 11:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
If the same Class-C-arrest rate held for the rest of the state, that would mean more than 76,000 people were booked into county jails that year when a Class-C misdemeanor was the highest charge.From the Sandra Bland Act data, we learned about the subset of Class C arrests that occur at traffic stops. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 4:31 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Now that the legislation has returned with new life, having been endorsed by both state political party platforms after being stripped out of the Sandra Bland Act in 2017, here's hoping the committee looks favorably on Rep. [read post]
A second opinion concluded that Y was in a vegetative state and that there was no prospect of improvement. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Michael Geist Doorey’s Workplace Law BlogHeller v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 10:54 am by Kent Scheidegger
There is an ineffective assistance case where trial counsel did not introduce expert testimony of battered woman syndrome in a case where duress was the defense, United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am by Carolyn Shapiro
The year before Harlan’s nomination the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:53 am by Rory Little
Of particular note, he expressed misgivings in Henry, and then again in 2008 (United States v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 9:30 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Defendants argued that blocking is not state action because it simply utilizes functionality made available to every Twitter user. [read post]