Search for: "Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co." Results 1 - 13 of 13
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2021, 10:09 am by Riana Harvey
The attractiveness of a design, intention of the author, and the design’s visual effect or symbolism would not be factors determining whether a design would be copyrightable (Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co).The Board also noted that, when it comes to derivative works, such claims will only be possible where the work in question contains new authorship with a sufficient amount of original expression, with the copyright only extending to the… [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am by Riana Harvey
Further case law has also illustrated that the attractiveness of a design, the intentions of the author, the design’s visual effect, symbolism and commercial success in the marketplace will not be factors in a finding of eligibility for copyright protection (Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co).In relation to derivative works, it is stated that the registration of such works would not cover any previously published or registered works (17 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Sep 2017, 8:12 am by Shyamkrishna Balganesh
Donaldson Lithographing Co., is a well-known early twentieth century copyright decision of the U.S. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 U.S. 239, 249 (1903) (Holmes, J.) [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 11:15 am by Michael A. Kahn
Donaldson Lithographing Co., 188 US 239 (U.S. 1903). [read post]