Search for: "Block v. Commissioners" Results 1 - 20 of 517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
In other words, the Court found that Hobby Lobby had a statutory right, not a constitutional right, to block certain medical coverage. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 3:12 pm by Lucy Reed
I regularly have my suitcase moved less than delicately or blocked in by other passengers on the train. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 9:48 am
News and the AP:Frustrated by court decisions that blocked the suspension of two football players who tested positive for banned substances, NFL commissioner Roger Goodell is asking Congress for help. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 9:46 am by Federalist Society
On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 5:34 am by Howard Bashman
FEC Case, Essentially Giving Republican Commissioners Unfettered Ability to Block All Campaign Finance Enforcement Matters with No Judicial Review of the Decision. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 2:07 am by Andrew Wheelhouse, OXHRH
Such a matter was recently considered by the UK Supreme Court in R (Catt and T) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2015] UKSC 9. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:08 am by Darius Whelan
 Later in 2013, the record companies successfully applied to the High Court for Kickass Torrents to be blocked.]High Court, EMI v UPC [2013] IEHC 204[copyright, access provider, ISP, torrent, ThePirateBay, blocking order, amicus curiae][Record companies had instituted proceedings seeking an order against various ISPs blocking access to the Pirate Bay website. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 3:02 pm
Chamber), with introductory note by Ryan Vogel Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Boston police officer union denied injunction to temporarily block body-worn camera test By Dave Strausfeld, J.D.Posted in Wolters Kluwer's WorkDayhttp://www.employmentlawdaily.com/A union of Boston police officers was not entitled to an injunction to temporarily block implementation of a pilot program to test body-worn cameras, held a Massachusetts Superior Court judge. [read post]