Search for: "Blow v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 2:06 pm
The issue of whether an employee has suffered a requisite “adverse employment action” under our state’s whistleblower law when transferred out of his longstanding job into another after he blows the whistle on his employer’s violations of law or public policy, was recently addressed by the New Jersey Appellate Division in Jeffrey Scozzafava v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
As this news story notes, both the federal government and the State of Indiana have charged Bradbury for the comments in his Facebook post. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:28 pm
(Schrems v the Irish Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14). [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 11:30 am
” The lawsuit, New York et al. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:36 pm
United States and preserve the ACA. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 5:01 am
In State v. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 10:00 am
” Opposing counsel is blowing smoke at this young lawyer. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 2:29 pm
The ACLU of Northern California will press ahead in Haskell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 4:16 am
Whistleblower must blow the whistle to claim the whistleblower protection provided by the Whistleblower Statute, Civil Service Law §75-bHastie v State Univ. of N.Y. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:49 am
Supreme Court last week dealt a blow to the government in Allison Engine Co. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
In 2005, in a blow to assignments for the benefit of creditors ("ABC") in California, the Ninth Circuit in Sherwood Partners Inc. v. [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:06 pm
In 2005, in a blow to assignments for the benefit of creditors ("ABC") in California, the Ninth Circuit in Sherwood Partners Inc. v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 1:30 am
Constitution states in part that the "right of the people to be secure in their persons . . . against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated….' Last month's decision by the United States Supreme Court in the case of Florence v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm
And in State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:02 am
In a blow to the convention wisdom of Supreme Court patent-watchers, the Supreme Court actually affirmed the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 5:29 pm
Res. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 1:19 pm
Prosecutors trying to stop intellectual property theft were dealt a blow in United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 8:35 pm
The Supreme Court of the United States recently dealt the NLRB a critical blow in New Process Steel v. [read post]
