Search for: "Blue Cross v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 69
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jan 2010, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
On January 12, 2009, the Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division One) issued an order modifying its opinion and denying rehearing in a UCL public prosecutor case, Blue Cross of California, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2015, 4:55 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Henzes, 2015 Pa.Super. 169 (Pa.Super. 2015)(Op. by Bowes, J.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the trial court discovery decision of Judge Terrence R. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 5:06 pm by admin
Most recently, Superior Court Judge Stephen Bernstein reduced the award to the plaintiff attorneys from $6.5 million to $4.3 million. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Last week, the Court of Appeal (Fourth Appellate District, Division Three) picked up  its blue pencil and crossed this provision out of the FAL. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
Afflicted with a “culture of complacency[1],” the Ontario Superior Court has long struggled to timely advance cases to trial. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm by NARF
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan (Michigan Health Care False Claims Act (HCFCA)) Waukegan Potawatomi Casino, LLC v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:54 am by Joy Waltemath
Simply, the employee did not establish that the Blue Cross BlueSelect’s in-network plan was superior to Mutual of Omaha’s in-network HMO plan or why BlueChoice’s out-of-network coverage was preferable to Mutual of Omaha’s POS coverage. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 4:04 pm by John C. Manoog III
Liberty Mutual brought a motion to dismiss the case stating that Blue Cross had already paid the medical expenses, and on summary judgment the Superior Court agreed and dismissed the case. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 11:56 am
Blue Cross & Blue Shield Ass'n, 873 F.2d 1043, 1048 (7th Cir. 1989); cf. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 6:34 am by Jared Klaus
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, No. 09-2607 (Aug. 12, 2011), the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the district court’s decision to certify the class, which would have consisted of between 550 to 875 self-insured plans that entered into Administrative Services Contracts (“ASC’s”) with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (“BCBSM”). [read post]