Search for: "Board of Education, Etc. v. Board of Education, Etc"
Results 121 - 140
of 456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
The U.S. Supreme Court Almost, But Doesn’t, Strike a Big Blow to Unions and Agency Shop Arrangements
30 Jun 2014, 4:49 pm
Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 3:02 pm
Since the Copyright Board and the Federal Court of Appeal (at least in the CMEC K-12 decision) are arguably not following either the letter or the spirit the Supreme Court of Canada's landmark CCH v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 12:34 pm
Also at the Nixon Library is the famous helicopter from which he did his characteristic V-for-Victory pose before boarding to fly away from the White House after he resigned. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 8:35 am
This line of case law is supported by the recent General Court judgment in YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v EUIPO (case T-443/21). [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:45 am
Reputation based on case-law national level—including education, expertise/experience with patent cases, career path (career judges v. recognition judges, generalized v. specialized judge, etc.), management of litigation process, shared values. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:10 am
The agreement was subject to the approval of the Board of Education. [read post]
28 May 2023, 12:15 am
Section 31: Remuneration etc of charity trustees etc. [read post]
1 Jul 2007, 7:41 pm
Critical thinking in education (which requires that students think and object and support points etc) are all part of today's social studies curriculum . [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
Check back next week for my follow-up post, “The Software Code of Law: Lawyers v. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
12 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 (1977), is that “free-loaders,” those who receive the benefits, should pay some of the load. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 1:01 am
Virginia, Olmstead v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 2:33 pm
LUNA DEVELOPMENTS GROUP, LLC, etc., et al., Appellees. 3rd District.The Law Lady. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:27 am
Papish v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 4:00 am
In 2010, CanLII moved from a representative board of directors comprised of appointees from each of the provincial and territorial law societies, to a skills-based, expert board that would assume responsibility for determining CanLII’s strategic direction. [read post]
2 Apr 2007, 12:02 pm
In Altman v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 1:10 am
P6/FD4 causes controversy because, despite the protestations of the Patent Examination Board (PEB), some believe that P6/FD4 fails to assess a candidate's fitness to practice. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:31 am
Zarda, and Bostock v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 11:56 am
In Digrugilliers v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 3:08 pm
First, white women benefit significantly from state and federal affirmative-action programs (in higher education, small business loans, government contracts, etc.) and in the private sector with hiring and recent efforts to diversify boards of Fortune 500 companies. [read post]
