Search for: "Body v. Body"
Results 41 - 60
of 21,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2021, 5:33 am
Wilson, the case testing whether an elected body violates the First Amendment when it censures... [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 1:34 pm
Interestingly, in the case that is currently getting all of the attention on this, US v. [read post]
1 May 2012, 9:23 am
Complaint Under Armour Body Armor [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 9:53 am
" In the same vein, during oral arguments for Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 4:23 am
Regina (E) v Governing Body of JFS and Another, United Synagogue and Others intervening Supreme Court "The admissions policy of a Jewish school which gave priority, in the event of oversubscription, to children who were recognised as Jews under the standard Orthodox test of matrilineal descent, someone whose mother was a Jew either by birth or conversion, [...] [read post]
23 Nov 2009, 2:18 am
Neary v Governing Body of St Albans Girls’ School and Another Court of Appeal "An over-rigid approach was not required when an employment tribunal was considering an application for relief from sanction, for example, a strike-out founded on breach of an unless order. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 2:53 am
Neary v Governing Body of St Albans Girls’ School and another [2009] EWCA Civ 1190; [2009] WLR (D) 328 "The line of Employment Appeal Tribunal authority requiring an employment judge, who was considering an application for relief from sanctions, to consider all the factors identified in CPR r 3.9 was overruled. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 9:02 pm
It is striking that, even as the Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:05 am
Reviewing body must have jurisdiction to consider disciplinary appealsMontella v Bratton, Court of Appeals, 93 NY2d 424Although Section 75 of the Civil Service Law sets out what is probably the best-known statutory procedure for initiating disciplinary action against employees in the classified service, other statutory procedures are available for this purpose.* The Montella decision by the Court of Appeals points out the fact that one must consider the basis for the underlying… [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:28 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 11:28 am
In Thomas v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Further, said the Appellate Division, in Daily Gazette Co. v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145, the Court of Appeals held that, in the context of a FOIL disclosure of an officer's personnel records, preventing such disclosure requires more than merely demonstrating that the document "may be used" to evaluate performance.PBA had argued that the body-worn-camera was designed, in part, for performance evaluation purposes and is "clearly 'of… [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Further, said the Appellate Division, in Daily Gazette Co. v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145, the Court of Appeals held that, in the context of a FOIL disclosure of an officer's personnel records, preventing such disclosure requires more than merely demonstrating that the document "may be used" to evaluate performance.PBA had argued that the body-worn-camera was designed, in part, for performance evaluation purposes and is "clearly 'of… [read post]
22 May 2011, 5:49 am
The problem here, though, is that the Supreme Court in Miami Herald v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 8:58 pm
The Court in Domtar Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in South Central Jurisdictional Conference of the United Methodist Church v. [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 7:36 am
In Adams v. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
The Equine Touch Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 3:22 am
A body electing to go into executive session must indicate the precise reasons for its so doing and not merely recite the statutory categories for doing soZehner v Board of Educ. of Jordan-Elbridge Cent. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 9:05 pm
[Fields v. [read post]
