Search for: "Boland v. Boland" Results 1 - 20 of 117
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Oct 2010, 3:24 pm
EylerHeld: Courts must apply the business judgment rule in reviewing the decision of a board’s special litigation committee not to pursue a derivative claim alleging self-dealing.Facts: Certain shareholders (the “Shareholders”) of Boland Trane Associates, Inc. and Boland Trane Services, Inc. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:48 am
Accordingly, the court accepted its recommendation to terminate the pending derivative litigation.Facts:In Boland v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
The Court referred to its holding as an "Auerbach enhanced" standard, in reference to Auerbach v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
This submission relied on the dissent of McHugh J in Bashford v Information Australia (Newsletters) Pty Ltd. [read post]
28 Nov 2018, 6:41 am by scanner1
French DA 17-0468 2018 MT 289 Criminal – Justice Court Appeal Boland v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 9:44 am by Media Law Prof
Ende, Technology Law Group, LLC, Steve Tojic, Gallagher, Boland & Meiburger, LLP, have published Minority Television Project, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:58 am by scanner1
Estate of Boland DA 18-0607 2019 MT 236 Civil – Probate Lozeau v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:44 pm by Eugene Volokh
pdf=632252.pdf https ://disbarment61.rssing.com/chan-4741665/all_p1.html https ://clustrmaps.com/a/31dba8/ https ://casetext.com/case/boland-v-holder https ://buffalonews.com/news/new-ceglia-lawyer-has-own-issues/article_9f23f98b-3f6d-54bd-b63d-3b7e5b3b5d84.html https ://blog.expertpages.com/expertwitness/lawyer-who-created-digital-child-porn-must-pay-300k.htm https ://abovethelaw.com/tag/dean-boland/ http ://legalnews.com/detroit/1369660 http… [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 7:05 am by mtlawlibrary
Hartnett DA 19-0438 2020 MT 32N Civil – Justice Court Appeal Kohnke and Debo DA 19-0386 2020 MT 31N Civil – Domestic Relations Estate of Boland DA 19-0132 2020 MT 30N Civil – Probate State v. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 5:23 pm by Nicki Milionis
” Despite the decision in Perilya v Nash [2015] NSWSC 706 there was a concern that the courts might interpret the model provision more narrowly outside of NSW. [read post]