Search for: "Bonds v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2014, 5:25 am by Amy Howe
Commentators continue to discuss Monday’s decision in Bond v. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 9:01 pm by Brad Miller
State legislatures have discretion to set tax and spending priorities, the Supreme Court said in 1977 in United States Trust Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 7:00 am by Christopher G. Hill
In fact, Safeco Insurance Co. of America, a surety, made exactly the above argument in Yard Works LLC v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 4:19 pm
  But the basic scoop is that the defendant was charged with a crime, a bail bonding company posted his bail, the defendant skipped town, the guy was ultimately arrested and incarcerated in another state, and the LAPD ultimately went to Nebraska and extradited the guy and brought him back to Los Angeles. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:36 pm by Lawrence Solum
In considering the South African case of Laugh It Off Promotions CC v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DiNapoli said that having voters weigh in on new state debt is a sound approach.The budget would authorize an additional $10.3 billion in new state-supported debt, all to be issued by public authorities except the proposed $3 billion Restore Mother Nature GO Bond Act. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DiNapoli said that having voters weigh in on new state debt is a sound approach.The budget would authorize an additional $10.3 billion in new state-supported debt, all to be issued by public authorities except the proposed $3 billion Restore Mother Nature GO Bond Act. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
Since I'm still feeling a bit under the weather, I'm happy to direct you to other posts around the web on the case to fill the void in my coverage:Court allows taxing bond interest, attack on child pornMore on United States v. [read post]