Search for: "Bonds v. State" Results 641 - 660 of 4,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
The irony is that the money the states and local governments receive from Washington is derived either from federal taxes paid by residents of the states or from the sale of bonds that their children will have to redeem. . . . [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 8:43 am
Related Web Resources: Institutional Capital Management Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 1:46 pm by Goldberg Segalla LLP
Benjamin v Ahren Bennett and United States of America Bond v Progressive Ins Co Capobianco v Simolike Heim v Medical Care Knopick v Connelly People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 7:34 am by Joy Waltemath
Affirming, the state supreme court noted that HansaWorld asked the lower court, both in its brief and at the July 13 hearing, to condition any relief given to the employee on her posting a bond, but she neither wrote a response brief nor objected at the hearing when the judge stated he was going to require the $100,000 bond. [read post]
4 May 2011, 1:37 pm by WIMS
Because the "effective" clause in the bond condition of the 2009 Certification did not operate to block or delay the federal licensing proceeding, and it did not contravene Section 401(a)(1)'s waiver provision, much less the Commission's regulations, Alcoa Power's objections to the substantive content of the 2009 Certification is a matter of State law that is properly raised in the State proceeding, as Alcoa Power has done. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 8:44 am
On July 31, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:29 pm
Justice Sotomayor stumbles at page 16, line 2, after raising a principle of statutory interpretation from last year's Bond case (the chemicals-on-the-doorknob case, where the Court read a federal statute not to criminalize a matter that lay within the traditional powers of the state). [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Like Vince, I don’t want to spend too much debating the question of how pro-bond holder and how out of step with prior law the 19th Century Supreme Court railroad bond cases were (and indeed how out of step they were with the Court’s understanding of non-infrastructure related municipal bond cases like Loan Association v. [read post]