Search for: "Bonner v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 79
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Dec 2023, 3:12 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 2022) Having found the dispute over the ’562 patent moot, the court next considered the proper disposition—whether to simply dismiss the appeal or also vacate the PTAB decision under United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Back in March, the Supreme Court invited the solicitor general to file a brief expressing the views of the United States on these cases. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:59 pm
The United States Forest Service granted a timber permit for doing just that way up in the Idaho panhandle -- that strip of land way up north near Canada. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 8:41 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Patent Owner SynQor appeals, asking this court to vacate the Board’s decision rejecting claims 49 and 50 of the ’021 patent pursuant to United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 2:07 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Chantell and Michael Sackett bought a residential lot in Bonner County, Idaho over fifteen years ago. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
(as he then was) stated in Collins v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am by Schachtman
Furthermore, Justice Blackmun’s observation about traditional means was looking back at an era when in most state and federal court, a person found to be minimally qualified, could pretty much say anything regardless of scientific validity. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:37 pm by Paul J. Fraidenburgh
On November 1, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a sweeping victory for Buchalter’s client Bonner County, owner and operator of Sandpoint Airport in Sandpoint, Idaho. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 5:37 am by Paul J. Fraidenburgh
On November 1, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit handed down a sweeping victory for Buchalter’s client Bonner County, owner and operator of Sandpoint Airport in Sandpoint, Idaho. [read post]
27 Jul 2016, 9:45 am by Ron Coleman
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to “allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]