Search for: "Booker v. Booker" Results 1 - 20 of 1,173
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2014, 12:04 am by familoo
It appears to resemble this case on Bailli: LB Barnet v M1 [2012] EWCC 5 Fam, but it is impossible to be sure, although this report seems to make it more likely to be the same case : Deported, Imprisoned and Beaten for being a parent (I note in passing at the bottom of that article the apology for what appears to have been significantly inaccurate reporting of a “secret” event at which Mr Booker appears not to have been present, which one might think would have… [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 12:20 pm
Then tell me why Richard Booker committed these murders.It sounded like just an ordinary night out with friends.  [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 9:32 am
In addition to the Sixth Circuit's affirmance of a long within-guideline child porn sentence (discussed here), the court yesterday also rejected a claim that Booker should be applied retroactively in Duncan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 2:49 pm
Much has been written on how the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 5:00 pm
Much has been written on how the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2007, 2:49 pm
Much has been written on how the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 5:36 am
Olson Guideline "Departures" at Sentencing by Robert Don Gifford Off The Beaten Path: A Case Study of Unusual Post-Booker Litigation In United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:11 pm
  But, as evidenced by a ruling from the Ninth Circuit today in US v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 11:00 am by Paul Caron
Rev. ___ (2014): It has been nearly ten years since the Supreme Court’s seminal decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 11:08 am
The Third Circuit issued a substantial ruling on various post-Booker sentencing issues today in US v. [read post]
14 May 2007, 7:36 am
Continuing its tradition of thoughtful (and often divided) post-Booker work, the Sixth Circuit today in Valentine v. [read post]