Search for: "Booth v. Booth" Results 161 - 180 of 827
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2011, 1:48 am by elemembers
Case reference: Garside and Laycock Ltd v Mr T G Booth It is easy to see why Garside and Laycock took the decision to make their employees accept a pay cut rather than make them redundant since it is a cheaper and less unpleasant and disruptive process. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 1:48 am by elemembers
Case reference: Garside and Laycock Ltd v Mr T G Booth It is easy to see why Garside and Laycock took the decision to make their employees accept a pay cut rather than make them redundant since it is a cheaper and less unpleasant and disruptive process. [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by Cyrus Farivar
Enlarge (credit: jshyun) In the world of American privacy law, one Supreme Court decision casts a long shadow over all others: Katz v. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 10:26 am by Rahul Bhagnari, ACLU
But now -- less than a month into state legislative sessions, and about a week after the 40th anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 10:49 am by Sean Vanderfluit
A recent case that caught my eye touched on this principle, The Owners, Strata Plan NW 2575 v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:41 am by Kent Scheidegger
  I certainly hope the Court is not even considering going down the disastrous road of Booth v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:26 am
Jerry Rabinowitz, plaintiff in the federal court case of Rabinowitz v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 3:18 pm by Sean Patrick Donlan
Royal Dutch Petroleum, and the International Court of Justice in Germany v. [read post]
1 Dec 2007, 2:33 am
The year was 1965, and the law of the land was the "trespass" doctrine of Olmstead v. [read post]