Search for: "Booth v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2024, 4:46 pm by Dennis Crouch
The statute states: It shall not be an act of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the United States or import into the United States a patented invention . . . solely for uses reasonably related to the development and submission of information under a Federal law which regulates the manufacture, use, or sale of drugs or veterinary biological products. 35 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 2:33 pm by Bona Law PC
Something like this is what happened in North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Such racial cleansings and establishment of “sundown towns” happened across the United States. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 4:02 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“If the language of a release is clear and unambiguous, the signing of a release is a jural act binding on the parties” (Nucci v Nucci, 118 AD3d at 763; see Booth v 3669 Delaware, 92 NY2d 934, 935; Mangini v McClurg, 24 NY2d 556, 563). [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 9:44 am by Gene Takagi
For example, registering voters at a state fair booth without reference to any candidate or political party (other than official voter registration forms) satisfies the requirements for neutrality in this context. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by Guest Contributor
The southern region of the United States is known for its warm welcomes, politeness that isn’t pretentious, and genuine helpfulness. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
These provisions of Texas' self-defense laws generally track the laws in other U.S. states. [read post]
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
 Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Mark Ashton
On June 24, 2022, the United States Supreme Court reversed its 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 4:42 am by Emma Snell
Russian nationals Timofey Telegin and Sergey Tulyakov, who control sanctioned Russian companies that received some of the shipments, also face several charges, including money laundering conspiracy and conspiracy to defraud the United States. [read post]
Case date: 06 May 2022 Case number: No 21-3616 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]