Search for: "Borenstein v. Borenstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2024, 9:24 pm
McLaughlin v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 8:07 am
”) [8] James Mortimer, Amy Borenstein, and Lorene Nelson, “Associations of welding and manganese exposure with Parkinson disease: Review and meta-analysis,” 79 Neurology 1174 (2012). [9] Bernard D. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
" Citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the court said that the Medical Board "properly based its conclusion on its examination" of the Applicant and his medical records, which provided some credible evidence to support its findings. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:00 am
"A mere conflict in opinion among physicians is not a ground for disturbing a determination; and [3] "Courts may not 'substitute [their] own judgment for that of the Medical Board,' citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d at 761. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 7:00 am
"A mere conflict in opinion among physicians is not a ground for disturbing a determination; and [3] "Courts may not 'substitute [their] own judgment for that of the Medical Board,' citing Matter of Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 88 NY2d at 761. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Citing Meyer v Board of Trustees of N.Y. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's ruling, concluding that the denial of Plaintiff's application for ADR was "not arbitrary and capricious, but [was] based on credible evidence in the record. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 7:00 am
Citing Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's ruling, concluding that the denial of Plaintiff's application for ADR was "not arbitrary and capricious, but [was] based on credible evidence in the record. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 8:00 am
Last week, in Borenstein v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 10:21 am
Litigation-related research has been the punching bag of self-appointed public health advocates for some time. [read post]
22 Oct 2016, 2:40 pm
Brian v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 7:55 am
Batty v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 7:48 am
James Mortimer, Street v. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 6:05 am
Niven v. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 10:23 am
See Shilkoff v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:21 pm
See Cooley v. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 5:33 pm
Borenstein to read the entire Order. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 4:32 am
Citing Borenstein v New York City Employees' Retirement System, 88 NY2d 756, the Appellate Division said that Supreme Court “exceeded the scope of its review,” which is to determine “whether ‘some credible evidence’ supported the Medical Board's determination as to disability. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
In the Celebrex/Bextra litigation, both sides acknowledged the general acceptance and validity of meta-analysis, for both observational studies and clinical trials, but attacked the other side’s witnesses’ meta-analyses on grounds specific to how they were conducted. [read post]
