Search for: "Borg-Warner Corporation" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Mar 2008, 4:00 am
Vaughn Co.Judge Zagel1:07-cv-03339             Borg Warner Inc. et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:01 pm
In the 1970's, carburetor maker, Borg-Warner told FAA that pilots caused the problem by using automotive gas instead of aviation fuel. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 11:32 pm by Curt Cutting
  For example, plaintiffs often ask for a balance sheet, but some defendants, especially individuals and closely held corporations, may not have any balance sheet. [read post]
26 May 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
There is no date of impression or publication.D2 - click to enlargeIt can be seen from the declaration of Mr Ozimek, filed as document D15, that Mr Ozimek has been working in the pigment distribution business for Mearl Corporation (from 1994 to 1996), for Engelhard Corporation, which had merged with Mearl Corporation (from 1996 to 2006) and for BASF Corporation, which has merged with Engelhard Corporation (since 2006). […]NB: BASF Corporation… [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Borg Warner Corporation et al., plaintiffs have argued claimants with non-malignant asbestos-related illnesses (i.e., asbestosis) require them to establish a “physical impairment” with prima facie evidence of in the initial complaint. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 11:43 am by Kaylin S. Grey
Borg Warner Corporation, et. al., Case No. 14-027985, Miami-Dade County, Florida case, Plaintiffs attempt to undo the legislative reform of asbestos litigation in Florida by challenging the constitutionality of the following provisions of the Act: (1) the pleading requirements for establishing an alleged non-malignant asbestos-related physical impairment; (2) the limitations on the liability of sellers and retailers; and (3) the abolition of punitive damages. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 11:43 am by Kaylin S. Grey
Borg Warner Corporation, et. al., Case No. 14-027985, Miami-Dade County, Florida case, Plaintiffs attempt to undo the legislative reform of asbestos litigation in Florida by challenging the constitutionality of the following provisions of the Act: (1) the pleading requirements for establishing an alleged non-malignant asbestos-related physical impairment; (2) the limitations on the liability of sellers and retailers; and (3) the abolition of punitive damages. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 11:22 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Borg Warner Corporation et al., plaintiffs have argued claimants with non-malignant asbestos-related illnesses (i.e., asbestosis) require them to establish a “physical impairment” with prima facie evidence of in the initial complaint. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 6:00 am by Anjelica Cappellino
The other defendants named in the lawsuit, including talc suppliers Honeywell/Bendix, Borg Warner, and Fel-Pro, are responsible for the remainder. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 4:31 am by Broc Romanek
In his "Proxy Disclosure Blog," Mark Borges discusses these new FAQs. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Some Pennsylvanian companies which have been sued for asbestos-related personal injuries are: Pittsburgh Corning Corporation NARCO Amatex Corporation United Gilsonite Laboratories Pacor Incorporated Combustion Engineering Asbestos exposure was accountable for the death of 14,216 Pennsylvania residents between 1999 and 2013, with a terrible death rate of 7.5 (the nationwide average is only 4.9). [read post]
28 Jul 2015, 1:35 pm by Anthony B. Cavender
Borg Warner Corp., that CERCLA’s “Arranger Liability” for Superfund cleanup responsibility did not apply to most straightforward business transactions in which an intent to dispose of hazardous waste or hazardous substances in the guise of a business transaction could not be established. [read post]