Search for: "Boston Scientific Corporation"
Results 221 - 240
of 301
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2010, 3:24 am
(Boston Scientific Corp. entered into a five-year CIA in December of last year, concurrent with its settlement of allegations that it used post-market studies to pay kickbacks to physicians.) [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Boston Scientific Corp. and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:02 am
Boston Scientific (Docket Report)(271 Patent Blog) District Court N D Illinois: Allegation that plaintiff ‘buried’ prior art in IDS is sufficient to state of claim for inequitable conduct: CIVIX-DDI LLC v National Association of Realtors et al (Docket Report) District Court Massachusetts: Attorney delinquence excuses 7 year delay in reviving expired patent: SprinGuard Technology Group Inc. v USPTO (271 Patent Blog) District Court Wyoming: Filing a patent on behalf of a… [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 1:24 pm
“Scientific research” became less important than scientific fact, and profits became the driving force in research and development. [read post]
6 Feb 2010, 1:24 pm
“Scientific research” became less important than scientific fact, and profits became the driving force in research and development. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
Barr Laboratories, Inc. and Mylan Pharma (Patent Docs) (Patently-O) Omnicef (Cefdinir) – US: CAFC on whether a product-by-process claim is infringed by an identical product made by different process: Abbott Labs v Sandoz (IP Frontline) Pertussis vaccines – UK: EWHC dismisses Medeva appeal against pertussis vaccines SPCs refusal (The SPC Blog) Plavix (Clopidogrel) – Canada: Adding some obvious flexibility: Apotex Inc v Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc (IP Osgoode) Rapamune (Rapamycin) -… [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 5:29 am
Boston Scientific, et al., 1-03-cv-00027 (DED January 28, 2010, Memorandum Order) (Robinson, J.) [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
., and Olin Corporation. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:08 am
Boston Scientific Corporation, C.A. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 10:50 am
Plaintiffs Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:44 am
"Boston Scientific Corporation et al. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 8:51 am
The company was bought by Boston Scientific Corporation for $27 billion in 2006. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 1:17 pm
As part of the settlement, Boston Scientific has also agreed to enter into a corporate integrity agreement which, among other things, requires the company to publicly disclose on its website payments to physicians. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
The agreement, lodged in federal court in Boston, resolves federal and state liability claims against 49 potentially responsible parties for the cleanup of the site. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
The agreement, lodged in federal court in Boston, resolves federal and state liability claims against 49 potentially responsible parties for the cleanup of the site. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 9:35 am
" Dow Jones Newswire reported that in addition to paying the $22 million, Boston Scientific has also said it would adhere to a corporate integrity agreement with the Department of Health and Human Services. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 5:24 am
- Cassation Court’s criminal chamber orders destruction of 3,123 Abode of Chaos works of art – copyright questions (1709 Copyright Blog) Germany Federal Supreme Court: incidental introduction of new document and due process in opposition proceedings (EPLAW) Federal Supreme Court: Prior use right and contractual arrangements between inventor and alleged infringer (EPLAW) Hong Kong Giorgio Armani not amused by Giormani of Hong Kong (IP Dragon) India Madras High Court… [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:08 am
For its part, Pfizer contends that two state judges in Pennsylvania have reached the opposite conclusion: that juries should not be allowed to award punitive damages because there was insufficient evidence of corporate misconduct. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
Boston Scientific Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 9:39 am
In D Del, the ruling was that Howrey could remain Boston Scientific's counsel against Wyeth in the Delaware case, Boston Scientific Corp. v. [read post]
