Search for: "Boulware v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 54
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
There is no downside in asking.We should expect this line of questioning to be met with resistance from the trial court, which has broad discretion in limiting questioning during jury selection (see People v Boulware, 29 NY2d 135[1971]; People v Corbett, 68 AD2d 7762 [4th Dept 1979]). [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm by Brian Shiffrin
In People v Lewis (2010 NY Slip Op 02624 [4th Dept 3/26/10])the Fourth Department applied Arnold in the context of the common situation in which prospective jurors state that they would tend to favor the testimony of police witnesses over that of other witnesses:During voir dire, one of the prospective jurors stated that, as a result of her close association with police officers in the course of her work as a loss prevention officer, she would "probably take the word… [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 2:02 pm
People v Boulware, 1657, 4523/07, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2009 NY Slip Op 8972; 2009 N.Y. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 11:38 am
Illinois, No. 06-1413 (state gain issue) Boulware v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 9:38 am
Boulware, No. 05-10752 (3-9-09). [read post]