Search for: "Boumediene v. Bush" Results 61 - 80 of 857
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2018, 5:00 am by Sarah Grant
Bush, allowing Guantánamo detainees to challenge the legality of their detention. [read post]
9 Mar 2018, 5:13 am by Robert Chesney
True, Justice Anthony Kennedy in Boumediene v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Russell Spivak
Bush (ruling that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear detainees’ habeas petitions), Hamdi v. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 6:00 am by Russell Spivak
Bush (ruling that U.S. courts have jurisdiction to hear detainees’ habeas petitions), Hamdi v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 1:58 pm by Ilya Somin
For example, the Court showed very little deference to the Bush administration in the various cases challenging the legality of detentions at Guantanamo, such as Boumediene v. [read post]
20 Oct 2017, 10:00 am by Sarah Grant
Al-Alwi previously filed a habeas petition in 2005, which Judge Leon took up following the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:43 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Supreme Court itself gave Guantanamo detainees the right to challenge their conviction under that theory; it did so in its 2008 decision in the case of Boumediene v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 3:39 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The last time there was a significant decision on the Guantanamo detainees was a 2008 ruling, in the case of Boumediene v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 11:19 am by Mary B. McCord
  And he deplored as “wrong-headed” the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm by John Eastman
“There are limitations, of course, on the power of the Executive,” Kennedy was quick to point out, “even with respect to matters of national security” – citing as authority his own opinion in Boumediene v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am by Andrew Kent
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]