Search for: "Bowen v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 360
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2022, 9:00 am by Phil Dixon
There was therefore no error in the case. (1) Defendant’s challenge to the second step of the Batson analysis was preserved; (2) The State’s proffered explanations for its use of peremptory challenges were racially neutral; (3) The trial court did not clearly err in finding that the defendant failed to show purposeful discrimination under the totality of circumstances State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Most intriguingly, somewhere on the journey from Campbell v MGN to the draft Online Safety Bill, ‘Reasonable’ has been jettisoned. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 5:30 am by Sherron Watkins
“Sherron, even if it’s the last $10,000 you have, you have to use it to hire an attorney. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am by Cyberleagle
Most intriguingly, somewhere on the journey from Campbell v MGN to the draft Online Safety Bill, ‘Reasonable’ has been jettisoned. [read post]
21 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association), or obtain social security numbers as part of the welfare system at the time (Bowen v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Thus, “‘when it comes to Indian affairs, state courts are courts of limited jurisdiction'” (Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d at 296, quoting Bowen v Doyle, 880 FSupp 99, 114 [WD NY], affd 230 F3d 525 [2d Cir]). [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Commissioner opined that although the language of Education Law §310(7) “could literally, and if it stood alone, embrace much more than the common school classifications of the first six subdivisions, the words ... do not stand alone, and ... are circumscribed and modified by the contextual words which precede and follow them”, citing Matterof Bowen v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
" The Commissioner opined that although the language of Education Law §310(7) “could literally, and if it stood alone, embrace much more than the common school classifications of the first six subdivisions, the words ... do not stand alone, and ... are circumscribed and modified by the contextual words which precede and follow them”, citing Matterof Bowen v. [read post]