Search for: "Bowen v. State" Results 281 - 300 of 349
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2009, 7:08 am
The state of Texas’ views were invited in Rhine v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:21 am
 The office of the state public defender has reportedly committed an additional $25,000. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Mich. 1987) ............................................................ 46 Wheeling-Pittsburgh Steel Corp. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 2:57 am
Stroop, 496 U.S. 478, 485 (1990); Bowen v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 3:53 am
Heffernan v LB Hackney [2009] EWCA Civ 655 is a timely reminder of the importance of having evidence to substantiate a claim for damages. [read post]
27 May 2009, 4:00 am
In my latest FindLaw column I discuss the case of Bowen v. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:03 am
Hilarie's analysis focuses on Young v. [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
EEO/iNews from State CourtsiNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
14 May 2009, 12:34 pm
This, the defendants argue, is the required result applying the decision of Pittfield, J in  Bowen v. [read post]
2 May 2009, 7:51 am
John Bowen's wonderful book, Why the French Don't Like Headscarves, nicely shows how the French state has projected fantasies on what Islam must be like onto people with very different agendas, thus exacerbating the alienation and marginality of Muslim citizens.[3]The obvious advantage of passive secularism is that it is a possible object of overlapping consensus. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:01 am
As the court stated:"The Court is mindful that "[I]n a school disciplinary proceeding, evidence may consistof hearsay and reasonable inferences drawn will be sustained if the record supports theinference" (see Matter of Ebert v Yeshiva University, 28 AD3d 3 15, 3 16 [2006], citingMatter of Board of Education District v Commissioner of Education, 9 1 NY2d 133, supra). [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 6:47 pm
Homebuyers' rights under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) prohibit any type of kickback or fee-splitting arising from settlement services regardless of whether the homebuyers were overcharged the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit recently ruled in  Carter v Welles-Bowen Realty, Inc, No 07-3965 (6th Cir, January 23, 2009). [read post]